When it comes to food magazine writing styles, people differ. Think piece or recipe? Mini memoir or service article? Different people see things differently. So, if we hold different opinions on blog posts or food magazine writing styles, it’s no surprise we disagree about more than that, too. There is a school of thought, for example, that says we cannot change our basic selves. People in this camp say that who we are intrinsically is who we have to be, give or take a few small choices. They feel someone like me will always be someone like me, maybe with different circumstances or friends or hairstyles, but always the same me deep down. Do you think that?
I’m not sure. There’s another camp that disagrees–make your own destiny! carpe diem! To be totally honest with you, I like them better. I want to believe I can change—or rather, that I can be changed—and I want to believe that about you.
Thing is, change is hard to measure. Take asparagus. When you trim a bunch of fresh white asparagus and lay it on a baking sheet, rolling the stalks in lemon olive oil and sprinkling them with salt and pepper before you roast it all in the white-hot oven, you can watch it transform before you from hard and cold to bruised and limp, with spots of darkness from the heat all over its thin stalks, and you can know there’s change there, no question. But would some say it’s not much of a change? Though softened and broken, it is, after all, still asparagus?
Or take potatoes.
You can boil baby golds, the way you’ve done before, cooking them until they’re soft, then smashing them and coating their soft skins with olive oil and salt and pepper like you did the asparagus, and you can roast them, too, until they’re crispy and golden, wonderful to pop in your mouth one by one but, at the end, bettered by heat and seasoning and time. Are they changed? Are they essentially the same?
And then there’s fish. Tilapia.